Cases 11 - 20 of 183
Randall v. Oneil et al
as 9:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Carl Randall and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant:
Colleen M. Oneil, Brian R. McDermott, Peter R. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Oneil et al
as 9:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Carl Randall and Jarrod C. Randall
Defendant:
Colleen M. Oneil, Brian R. McDermott, Peter R. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cummings v. Jefferson County, New York et al
as 9:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
Seth Cummings
Defendant:
Jefferson County, New York, Colleen M. O'Neill, Brian R. McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02942
Plaintiff:
Lucia B. McDermott
Defendant:
Exactech Inc, Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDermott v. PanaGenius Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv02813
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Defendant:
PanaGenius Inc. and Face2Face Africa LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McDermott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06149
Plaintiff:
Andrew McDermott, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
McDermott v. Kalita Mukul Creative Inc.
as 1:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Defendant:
Kalita Mukul Creative Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McDermott v. Light the Region Media LLC
as 6:2023cv06094
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Defendant:
Light the Region Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
