Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Maxell, Ltd. v. FOTV Media Networks Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07538
Defendant:
CinemaNow, LLC and FOTV Media Networks Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maxell, Ltd.
Free Press, et al v. FCC, et al
as 17-1129
Petitioner:
Free Press, Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Inc., Prometheus Radio Project and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
ION Media Networks, Inc., National Association of Broadcasters, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
FRED BLUMBERG v. WPP GROUP USA, INC. et al
as 8:2016cv00957
Defendant:
Alphonso Inc, Audience Xpress LLC, Cognitive Media Networks Inc and others
Plaintiff:
FRED BLUMBERG
Leon Bunnell v. Vizio Holdings, Inc., et al
as 8:2016cv00906
Plaintiff:
Leon Bunnell
Defendant:
Cognitive Media Networks, Inc., Vizio Holdings, Inc. and Vizio, Inc.
Sebastien DuFort v. Vizio, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00898
Defendant:
Cognitive Media Networks, Inc. and Vizio, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sebastien DuFort
BLUMBERG v. WPP GROUP USA, INC. et al
as NJ/3:16-cv-02670
Plaintiff:
FRED BLUMBERG
Defendant:
WPP GROUP USA, INC. , THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC. , ALPHONSO, INC. and others
BLUMBERG v. WPP GROUP USA, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv02670
Plaintiff:
FRED BLUMBERG
Defendant:
WPP GROUP USA, INC., THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC., ALPHONSO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Von Haden v. Vizio, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00741
Respondent:
Cognitive Media Networks Inc and Vizio Inc
Petitioner:
Daniel Von Haden
Carolin Tongarm v. Vizio, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00739
Respondent:
Cognitive Media Networks Inc and Vizio Inc
Petitioner:
Caroline Tongarm
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
