Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ford v. Carter County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2015cv00229
Plaintiff:
George Paul Ford
Defendant:
Carter County Sheriff's Department, Carter Co Jail, Medical Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. All the Judges and P.D.s and D.A. et al
as 2:2015cv02407
Plaintiff:
Lloyd E. Seay
Defendant:
All the Judges and P.D.s and D.A., All Chaplains and Counselors, Grievance Comm. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinner v. Moore et al
as 2:2015cv02105
Defendant:
Moore, Aston Smith, Maurice Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Kinner and Timothy Kinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
York v. Maury Co. Jail et al
as 1:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
Melissa L. York
Defendant:
Maury Co. Jail and Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amyx v. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Amyx
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail and Sullivan County Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timms v. Tucker et al
as 3:2011cv01109
Plaintiff:
William Timms
Defendant:
f/n/u Tucker and Rutherford County Adult Detention Center Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seabrooks v. C.C.A. - Medical Dept. et al
as 1:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Shairiq Seabrooks
Defendant:
C.C.A. - Medical Dept., Tn. Department of Corrections and Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blayde v. Criminal Justice Center Medical Dept.
as 2:2011cv02575
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blayde
Defendant:
Criminal Justice Center Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2011cv02513
Plaintiff:
Edward Moore
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center, Medical Dept. and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Echols v. Shelby County Detention Center et al
as 2:2010cv02586
Plaintiff:
James Echols
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Center, Andrew Taber, Jr., Anita Barbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
