Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Harris et al v. USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner et al
as 3:2020cv00321
Plaintiff:
Julius Lee Thomas, Charlie Harris, RonDell Harris and others
Defendant:
Employees/Staff Officers, Etc., USP Big Sandy Food Services Admin, USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz-Medina v. Kizziah et al
as 6:2020cv00021
Defendant:
FNU Philip, Gregory Kizziah and USA
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Reid v. Ward et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Plaintiff:
Alexander Medina Ray Reid
Defendant:
Brian Lampton, Pennyrile Mental Health Triage, Leigh Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Medina v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Medina
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Medina et al v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jose Santacruz Medina and Cesar Alvarez Santacruz
Defendant:
Jose Hernandez and Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Del Campo et al v. Mealing et al
as 3:2011mc00011
Plaintiff:
Elena Del Campo , Lois Artz , Charles Schwab & Assoc. and others
Defendant:
Don R. Mealing, American Corrective Counseling Services, Inc., Bruce D. Raye and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Damon Wright
Intervenor_defendant:
Maria Hamilton, Damon Wright, Audra Phillips and others
Riches v. Field & Stream Magazine et al
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Field & Stream Magazine, Jonas Bonnier, Tony Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Quinn v. Medina et al
as 1:2008cv00078
Plaintiff:
Mathew O'Quinn
Defendant:
Ricardo Medina, Ricardo Medina, Gustavo Jimenez, Inc., d/b/a Southwest Freightlines and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
