Cases 11 - 20 of 13,723
PETROVIC v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04160
Plaintiff:
JELENA PETROVIC
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Broderick et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03678
Plaintiff:
John J. Broderick and Quishi Sha
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Carroll Independent School District v. United States Department of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Carroll Independent School District
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Education, Catherine E. Lhamon, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Rosa Mejia-Lopez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-2027
Petitioner:
Rosa Mejia-Lopez, P.T.M., S.T.M. and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Porto Queiroz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3168
Petitioner:
JACSON PORTO QUEIROZ, VANESSA OLIVEIRA QUEIROZ, ANA BEATRIZ OLIVEIRA QUEIROZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ferrer-Jacinto v. Garland
as 24-3182
Petitioner:
EDUARDO FERRER-JACINTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pallares-Medina, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3184
Petitioner:
GRISEL PALLARES-MEDINA, LUZ ALEJANDRA GUZMAN-PALLARES and GRETTEL GISELLE GUZMAN-PALLARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nava-Capilla v. Garland
as 24-9534
Petitioner:
ANTONIO NAVA-CAPILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
