Cases 11 - 20 of 201
Holmes v. Precythe et al
as 6:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Michelle Buckner, John Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Bertram Lemoyne Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, South Central Correctional Center, Missouri Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amlin v. Buckner
as 6:2024cv03051
Petitioner:
Qwenten D Amlin
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Afiz v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Abdul Al-Hakeem Afiz
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slater et al v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Slater and Jermaine McDaniels
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Heath Cantrell, Smith Billy William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marron v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Vicente Roldan Marron
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barbee v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Andrew T Barbee
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv01584
Petitioner:
Keith Wright
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Afiz v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Abdul Hakeem Afiz and Miron Taylor
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert Goodwin v. Michele Buckner
as 23-3503
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Goodwin
Respondent / Appellee:
Michele Buckner, Warden, South Central Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
