Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1151 Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00306
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1151 Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
Salim et al v. Mysha Management 4 Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Salim and Rafiedul Islam
Defendant:
Mysha Management 4 Inc., America's Best Pizza, Inc., Mohammad Aktar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mansaray v. Dean et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Petitioner:
Mohamed Mansaray
Respondent:
Robert Dean and The State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Bank of America, N.A. v. Mayone Grill LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02716
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Mayone Grill LLC, Mohammed Nadir Alumyar and Mohib Anvari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Kwaning v. USA - 2255
as 1:2022cv02041
Petitioner:
Mohammed Kwaning
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
