Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Alkhewani v. Atlantis Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv01558
Plaintiff:
Mohammed A. Alkhewani
Defendant:
Atlantis Van Lines, Inc. and Rame Masarwe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elli-Hou Farms, LLC v. Farie et al
as 1:2021cv00952
Plaintiff:
Elli-Hou Farms, LLC
Defendant:
Mohamed Abu Farie, E-Juice Vapor, Inc., Ahmad Abu Farie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albrecht et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fowler, Toren Pruden, Charles Withrow and others
Defendant:
Sue Washburn, Paula Myers, Ken Jeske and others
Petitioner:
Miles Erb, Leroy Lamont Wells and Serafin Pahua-Pahua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1451
Mohammed Nesredin Workicho
as 3:2019ad00306
In Re:
Mohammed Workicho and Mohammed N. Workicho
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01436
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00638
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02102
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1451 Revocation of Naturalization
Emery v. Premo et al
as 6:2015cv01227
Defendant:
Nurse Ann, T. Bailey, T. Byerly and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
