Cases 11 - 20 of 193
Campbell v. Wilkey et al
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Keenan Campbell
Defendant:
Wilkey, Jackson, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Delroy Brooks
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Osborn Correction Institute, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Davon Younger
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
William Young
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Martin, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Andres Carroll
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Carol Chapdelaine, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Morris Moore, Jr
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chisem v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Robert Chisem
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Richard Ortyl and Briant Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Willie Barnes
Defendant:
A. Quiros, Martin, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
