Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Nisbet v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Marilyn J. Nisbet
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc., Arcelormittal Minorca Mine, Inc., Arcelormittal USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Leann Bertsch, Robyn Schmalenberger, Sean Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Moore
Defendant:
Leann K Bertsch, Robyn T Schmalenberger, Steven B Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Leann K Bertsch, Robyn Schmalenberger, Beth Taghon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Schmalenberger
as 1:2010cv00065
Petitioner:
Kevin Deon Moore
Respondent:
Robyn Schmalenberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Bertsch
as 1:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Leann K Bertsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Cass County Jail Medical Department et al
as 3:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Cass County Jail Medical Department, Ralph Erickson, Daniel Hovland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Leann K Bertsch, Timothy Schuetzle, Daniel Hovland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Leann Bertsch, Timothy Schuetzle, Shaun Fode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Cass County Jail Medical Department et al
as 3:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Cass County Jail Medical Department, MeritCare Medical Center Clinic and Family Healthcare Clinic
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
