Cases 11 - 20 of 418
Benitez v. Neal et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Benitez
Defendant:
Messiah Neal and Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
O'Guynn et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv10700
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen O'Guynn, Neal Slocum, Ivan Hathaway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
M.S.G. v. Neal et al
as 1:2023cv09859
Plaintiff:
M.S.G.
Defendant:
David L. Neal, Charles Conroy, Ubaid Ul-Haq and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Constitutional Accountability Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Patel v. Patel et al
as 1:2023cv08765
Plaintiff:
The Excellent Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
Neal K. Patel and Sanjana Kumar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
