Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02286
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
R Bowers, J Rodriguez, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Simmons
as 22-10901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
NFN Simmons, Captain, NFN Ward, Captain, D. Wonders and others
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
NFN Bowers, NFN Wonders, NFN Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv01783
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
NFN Bowers, NFN Rodriguez, NFN Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ward et al
as 3:2022cv01361
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
NFN Ward, NFN Simmons, NFN Macedo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2022cv01307
Petitioner:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, NFN Bowers, NFN Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2022cv01291
Petitioner:
Kevin Jones
Respondent:
B. Lumpkin, NFN Bowers, NFN Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Simmons et al
as 3:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
NFN Simmons, NFN Ward, D Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2021cv01906
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Moore, D Wunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2021cv01068
Respondent:
NFN Simmons, J Rodriguez, R Moore and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
