Cases 11 - 20 of 62
JOHNSON v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
as 5:2020cv02960
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE A JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2020cv00782
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON and PRIME CARE
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOBKO v. SASKOR et al
as 5:2019cv02072
Defendant:
PAULA ROSCIOLI, JIMMY KOSTURA, DAVID PENCHISHEN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BOBKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DITTMAR v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
as 5:2019cv01537
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MICHAEL DITTMAR
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENNELL et al v. KOSTURA et al
as 5:2019cv00669
Defendant:
DAVID COLLINS, JAMES C. KOSTURA, LIEUTENANT CRUZ and others
Plaintiff:
NIGEL DOUGLAS, SCOTT BROCKEL, DEKOTA BAPTISTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REISS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2018cv03499
Plaintiff:
BARRY L. REISS, JR.
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON, JAMES KLIENMAN and LAUREN AGNEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LES GRUBE v. QUAGLIATO et al
as 5:2018cv01874
Plaintiff:
JUSTAN LES GRUBE
Defendant:
QUAGLIATO and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC et al
as 5:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
NADIR NAIM CHANDLER
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REISINGER v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2018cv00460
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. REISINGER
Defendant:
TODD BUSKIRK, COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL JOHN DOES? JANE DOES? et al
as 5:2017cv05786
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL LOPEZ
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL JOHN DOES? JANE DOES?, LUKES HOSPITAL ANDERSON CAMPUS JOHN DOES JANE DOES, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON (OFFICIALS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
