Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Jensen v. Brown et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Dr. Lars Jensen
Defendant:
Dr. Natalie Brown, Dr. Julie Ellsworth, Anne Flescher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McCarter v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Roy Rusch McCarter
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron D. Ford, District Attorney Steven B. Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Franco-Perez et al v. Thompson et al
as 2:2021cv01877
Plaintiff:
Marleen Franco-Perez and Natalie Perez
Defendant:
Richard Thompson, System Transport, Inc. and Richard A. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reberger v. Minev et al
as 2:2021cv01250
Plaintiff:
Lance Reberger
Defendant:
Michael Minev, B. Gutierrez, Laura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2021cv01196
Plaintiff:
Danielle Prince
Defendant:
United States of America, Nataly Alvarez, United States of America ex rel and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morales et al v. Trautman et al
as 2:2021cv00565
Defendant:
Dale Trautman and Ruby Ditto
Plaintiff:
Natalie Nelson, Jose Morales and Kayla Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
