Cases 11 - 20 of 23
(PC) David Roberts v. CSP - SAC et al
as 2:2020cv01564
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Darling, CSP - SAC and others
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Roberts v. Lynch
as 2:2020cv01349
Defendant:
Lynch
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. Franco, et al
as 1:2020cv00851
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Defendant:
Franco and Sgt. Huckleberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. CDCR et al
as 2:2020cv01194
Defendant:
Chief State Officer and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. California State Prison Sacramento
as 2:2020cv01068
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Defendant:
California State Prison Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. Kern Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00670
Defendant:
Delano Hospital, Chief State Officer and Kern Valley State Prison
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. Henderson
as 2:2020cv00811
Defendant:
Stephen Henderson
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. Henderson
as 1:2020cv00592
Defendant:
Stephen Henderson
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Roberts v. Robert Presley Detention Center-Riverside County Jail et al
as 5:2020cv00223
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Defendant:
Robert Presley Detention Center-Riverside County Jail and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Nathaniel Roberts v. CDCR Trust Office
as 2:2019cv01823
Defendant:
CDCR Trust Office
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
