Cases 11 - 20 of 36
The City of Chicago v. Sessions III
as 1:2017cv05720
Plaintiff:
The City of Chicago
Defendant:
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III
Amicu:
The California State Legislature , County of Santa Clara , Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, and Immigration Law Scholars and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Campbell et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv04467
Plaintiff:
Immanuel Campbell , Rubin Carter , Markees Sharkey and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Migel Villanueva, Josue Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RSUI Indemnity Company v. Neighborhood Lending Services, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02661
Plaintiff:
RSUI Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Neighborhood Lending Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxum Indemnity Company v. Neighborhood Lending Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
Maxum Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Neighborhood Lending Services, Inc. and Carolyn Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv50269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ramirez Rodriguez v. Michael's Neighborhood Pub, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07993
Plaintiff:
Sergio Ramirez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael's Neighborhood Pub, Inc. and Jamie Suckow
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cazares v. Michael's Neighborhood Pub, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06194
Plaintiff:
Ramon Camarillo Cazares
Defendant:
Michael's Neighborhood Pub, Inc. and Jamie Suckow
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
