Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Desmoulins v. City of New York
as 11-4797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ashleya S. Desmoulins, an infant under the age of fourteen and Levaud H. Desmoulins
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York and City of New York Department of Homeless Services
Desmoulins et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04809
Defendant:
City of New York and City of New York Department of Homeless Services
Plaintiff:
Ashleya S. Desmoulins and Levaud H. Desmoulins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caractor v. City of New York Department of Homeless Services et al
as 1:2011cv02990
Plaintiff:
William B. Caractor
Defendant:
City of New York Department of Homeless Services, Seth Diamond, HELP1 USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caractor v. City of New York Department of Homeless Services et al
as 1:2011cv02988
Plaintiff:
William B. Caractor
Defendant:
City of New York Department of Homeless Services, Seth Diamond, Xenia Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duncan v. New York Department of Homeless Services et al
as 1:2010cv08090
Plaintiff:
Danton Keith Duncan
Defendant:
New York Department of Homeless Services and Volunteers of America et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caractor et al v. City of New York Department of Homeless Services et al
as 1:2007cv08069
Plaintiff:
William B. Caractor and Discovered Being Ministry, Incorporated
Defendant:
City of New York Department of Homeless Services, Robert Hass, Martin Niel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caractor et al v. City of New York Department of Homeless Services et al
as 2:2007cv01591
Plaintiff:
William B. Caractor and Discovered Being Ministry, Incorporated
Defendant:
City of New York Department of Homeless Services, Robert Hess, Martin Niel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
