Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Shephard et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 3:2017cv01377
Plaintiff:
Mary Shephard, Tammy Whalen and Tammy Whaley
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Prochnow v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 3:2016cv02701
Plaintiff:
Leon W. Prochnow
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Whalen v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 1:2014cv00687
Plaintiff:
Michael Whalen
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Murray v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., et al
as 3:2012cv03109
Plaintiff:
Gavin Murray
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. , Mike B. Betancourt, Charles R. Raber, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Scott, et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 3:2011cv01051
Plaintiff:
Ray E. Scott, Jr. and Sharon K. Scott
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 3:2011cv00205
Plaintiff:
Ronald Saunders
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Garza v. Wabash Memorial Hospital Association et al
as 3:2009cv02045
Plaintiff:
Gene G Garza, Gene G Garza and Gene G Garza
Defendant:
Wabash Memorial Hospital Association, Wabash Memorial Hospital Association and Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gonzales v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01494
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gonzales
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
