Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dawes et al v. Oliphant Financial, LLC
as 1:2012cv01166
Plaintiff:
Gary Dawes and Sandra Dawes
Defendant:
Oliphant Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Girault et al v. Supersol 661 Amsterdam, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv06835
Plaintiff:
Fritz Girault , Arthur Hampton , Jean Duravil and others
Defendant:
Supersol 661 Amsterdam, LLC, Supersol of the Upper West Side, LLC, Super Sol Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Oliphant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv02431
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Darrel A. Oliphant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hampton et al v. Super Sol LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv01297
Defendant:
Laurence Garber, Benjamin Schrier, Super Sol LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Fritz Girault, Arthur Hampton, Jean Duravil Pierre Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Oliphant v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03263
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective Rogelio A. James and John/Jane Does #1-4
Plaintiff:
Kyara Oliphant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv09961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv08626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
