Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Thompson v. Otis Elevator Company
as 3:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Stacie Thompson
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Thomas v. Beshear et al
as 1:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Myron Otis Thomas
Defendant:
Steven L. Beshear, LaDonna H. Thompson, Rodney Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Thomas v. Campbell
as 3:2008cv00368
Petitioner:
Myron Otis Thomas
Defendant:
Tom Campbell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Huber
as 1:2008cv00046
Petitioner:
Otis L. Lewis
Respondent:
Robert Huber
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BYRD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 7:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. BYRD, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., OTIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Estate of Jesse L. Griffin et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co
as 4:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Jesse L. Griffin and The Estate of Otis L. Griffin, Sr.
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co and JPMorgan Chase & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Martin v. Chandler
as 3:2007cv00681
Petitioner:
Otis Martin
Respondent:
Larry D. Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goetz v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00117
Plaintiff:
Brian Goetz
Defendant:
Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation and Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
