Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Texas Data Co., L.L.C. v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2010cv00417
Plaintiff:
Texas Data Co., L.L.C.
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
NDW Patent Innovations LLC v. Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 4:2010cv00519
Plaintiff:
NDW Patent Innovations LLC
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Distributing Company The and Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Adidas America, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00491
Defendant:
Victoria's Secret Direct Brand Management, LLC, bergdorfgoodman.com, LLC, Gillette Company The and others
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
O & G SearchQuest, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 4:2010cv01164
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company , Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company and Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC
Plaintiff:
O & G SearchQuest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Akbar v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
H. N. Akbar
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Harryman v. SmithKline Beecham Corp d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 6:2010cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Harryman
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corp d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare LLC, Block Drug Company, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Procter & Gamble Company v. SC Johnson & Son Inc
as 9:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Company and others
Defendant:
SC Johnson & Son Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pequignot v. The Gillette Company et al
as 2:2008cv00222
Plaintiff:
Matthew A Pequignot and Matthew A Pequignot
Defendant:
The Gillette Company and The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
