Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Prosperity Systems, Inc. v. Ashraf
as 1:2015cv03887
Plaintiff:
Prosperity Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Syed Muhammad Ashraf
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Hart v. Roderick et al
as 1:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lekai Hart
Defendant:
R. Roderick, J. McMahan, Prosper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prosperity Mortgage Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al
as 1:2012cv02004
Plaintiff:
Prosperity Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Prosperity Mortgage Corp. et al
as 8:2011cv02532
Plaintiff:
Alexander A. Johnson
Defendant:
Prosperity Mortgage Corp. , Wells Fargo Bank, N.S. , Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myles v. Prosperity Mortgage Corp.
as 1:2011cv01234
Plaintiff:
Harold Myles , Michael Adamez , David Phillips and others
Defendant:
Prosperity Mortgage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Prosperity Systems, Inc. v. Ali
as 1:2010cv02024
Plaintiff:
Prosperity Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Nadeem Ali
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Ludwig v. Prosperity Mortgage Company et al
as 8:2010cv02025
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Ludwig, Jr.
Defendant:
Prosperity Mortgage Company, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Ventures, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Rozenbroek et al v. Project Oz Adoptions, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv02356
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rozenbroek, Elizabeth Rozenbroek, AJ and others
Defendant:
Project Oz Adoptions, Inc., Kerry Palakanis, David Palakanis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
