Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00213
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00214
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2007cv07288
Plaintiff: Syl Johnson doing business as Syl-Zel Music Co. & Twilight Record Co. also known as Sylvester Thompson and Sylvester Thompson
Defendant: KRS One, Boogie Down Production, Lawrence Parker and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Capitol Records, LLC and UMG Recordings, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Sunlight Records, INC. d/b/a Twilight/Twinight Records and Edgewater Music Co., Peter Wright and Comptown Records Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
WRIGHT v. METROPOLITAN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01808
Plaintiff: PETER WRIGHT
Defendant: METROPOLITAN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY and BEARINGPOINT, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Boudle v. CMI Network, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv02820
Plaintiff: Ange Boudle, Ange Boudle and Ange Boudle
Defendant: CMI Network, Inc., Clearsky Marketing, Inc, CMI Financial Network, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Boudle v. The CMI Network, Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv00750
Plaintiff: Ange Boudle
Defendant: The CMI Network, Inc., Clearsky Marketing, Inc., CMI Financial Network, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
WRIGHT et al v. OWENS-ILLINOIS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv60139
Plaintiff: PETER WRIGHT, JR. and MARIE H. WRIGHT
Defendant: OWENS-ILLINOIS INCORPORATED, KEENE CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?