Cases 11 - 20 of 696
Canfield et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03336
Plaintiff:
Jean Canfield and Peter Canfield
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03217
Defendant:
David C Young, BEAU D. WENGER, Scott A Smith and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flavin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03114
Plaintiff:
Peter Flavin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, Warden David LeMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02323
Plaintiff:
Laurie Joy Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peters v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Mel Peters
Defendant:
Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Peters v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02669
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Merle Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carmany v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
Peter Carmany
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hirmer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01991
Plaintiff:
Peter Hirmer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
