Cases 11 - 20 of 300
IronShore Specialty Insurance Company v. Matterport, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Matterport, Inc., RJ Pittman, David Gausebeck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Camus et al v. Sharp Healthcare
as 3:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Linda Camus and Deanna Franklin-Pittman
Defendant:
Sharp Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pi Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Cousin v. Sharp Healthcare
as 3:2022cv02040
Plaintiff:
Hannah Cousin, Linda Camus, Deanna Franklin-Pittman and others
Defendant:
Sharp Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv07143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clyde Ozell Pittman Jr. v. Brian Cates
as 2:2022cv06937
Petitioner:
Clyde Ozell Pittman, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re Meta Browser Tracking Litigation
as 3:2022cv05267
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mitchell, Gabriele Willis, Kerreisha Davis and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03806
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
