Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Lucero v. Moreno et al
as 2:2021cv01020
Plaintiff:
Jerry J. Lucero and Boyd Lucero
Defendant:
FNU Moreno, Otero County Prison Facility and New Mexico Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blueeyes v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2021cv00912
Petitioner:
Fred Blueeyes, Jr IV
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramos v. New Mexico Parole and Probation et al
as 2:2021cv00754
Plaintiff:
John Ramos
Defendant:
New Mexico Parole and Probation, Metropolitan Detention Center, Central New Mexico Correction Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Standridge et al
as 2:2021cv00491
Defendant:
Mark Standridge, Jennifer E. De Laney, Michael M Medina and others
Plaintiff:
Steven L Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Good News Jail & Prison Ministry
as 2:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
Erik Khan
Defendant:
Good News Jail & Prison Ministry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00008
Defendant:
FNU Brown, Curry County Adult Detention Center, FNU Judd and others
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00442
Defendant:
Kathleen McGarry, Bureau of Prisons, Kenneth Gleria and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lawrence Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinoco v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00712
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Dismas/Diersen Charities, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rocco Dominic Tinoco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. NENMDF
as 1:2019cv00595
Defendant:
NENMDF/GEO Group Prison Law Library and NENMDF
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Dunn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
