Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Jennings v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp.
as 8:2020cv02902
Defendant:
R.T.G. Furniture Corp. d/b/a Rooms to Go
Plaintiff:
Laqulla Jennings
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
R.T.G. Furniture Corp. v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 8:2020cv02323
Defendant:
Evanston Insurance Company, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Homeland Insurance Company of New York and others
Plaintiff:
R.T.G. Furniture Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
R.T.G. Furniture Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
as 8:2020cv01189
Plaintiff:
R.T.G. Furniture Corp.
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crowe v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp.
as 8:2019cv02700
Plaintiff:
Gary Crowe
Defendant:
R.T.G. Furniture Corp. d/b/a Rooms To Go, R.T.G. Furniture Corp. and R.T.G. Furniture Corp. doing business as Rooms to Go
Not Classified By Court:
Carolyn K. Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv80222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Martin v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp.
as 6:2018cv02220
Plaintiff:
Jacob Martin
Defendant:
R.T.G. Furniture Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Litster v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp.
as 8:2018cv01178
Plaintiff:
Barbara Litster
Defendant:
R.T.G. Furniture Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
