Cases 11 - 20 of 26
TAPIA et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03244
Plaintiff:
AARON THOMPSON, DANIEL TO'OTO'O, ALONZO THOMAS and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABDUR-RAHMAN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01187
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JIMENEZ, WILLIAM DEARMITT, SHANE HUNTER and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv61023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv61031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Roor International BV et al v. Lotus Smoke Shop, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Adnan Virani, Rahim Ali and Lotus Smoke Shop, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc. and Roor International BV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Moody v. City of Delray Beach et al
as 9:2015cv81790
Plaintiff:
Pauline Moody
Defendant:
City of Delray Beach, State of Florida, Don Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matani v. Caribbean Property Services, LLC et al
as 9:2014cv80446
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rahim Matani
Defendant:
Caribbean Property Services, LLC and John Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Kingham v. Tucker et al
as 8:2011cv02106
Plaintiff:
John R. Kingham, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Tucker, Alex Taylor, Kristen Manalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Supermarket Source, Inc. v. Dolphin Gourmet Market, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv23986
Plaintiff:
Supermarket Source, Inc.
Defendant:
Dolphin Gourmet Market, Inc. and Nael Abdel Rahim Ahmad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rahim v. McCracken et al
as 2:2009cv14390
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Abdul Rahim
Defendant:
R. McCracken and Haridas Bhadja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
