Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Freeman vs. Maybus
as 3:2014cv05841
Plaintiff:
Shirley Freeman
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Department of the Navy, Navy Exchange, Bremerton and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hood Canal Sand and Gravel, LLC v. Brady et al
as 3:2014cv05662
Plaintiff:
Hood Canal Sand and Gravel, LLC
Defendant:
Michael D Brady , Ray Mabus , Department of the Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hood Canal Sand and Gravel, LLC v. Brady et al
as 3:2014cv05620
Plaintiff:
Hood Canal Sand and Gravel, LLC
Defendant:
Michael D Brady , Ray Mabus , Department of the Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Morris v. Mabus
as 3:2014cv05320
Plaintiff:
Lowell V Morris
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Secretary of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv06093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Suquamish Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2012cv01455
Plaintiff:
Suquamish Tribe
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , John T McHugh , Bruce A Estok and others
Amicu:
Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe and Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bishop v. Mabus
as 3:2011cv05656
Plaintiff:
Eden T Bishop
Defendant:
Ray Mabus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
