Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Johnson v. Franco et al
as 7:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Michael E Rutledge, Warden A Franco and TDCJ Executive Director
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Seagoville Police Department
as 3:2019cv02588
Defendant:
Seagoville Police Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Johnson
Interested Party:
Chief Ray Calverley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 9:2019cv00118
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 6:2019cv00413
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Angelina County D.A. Office et al
as 2:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Angelina County D.A., Court of Criminal Appeals, Angelina County Defense Attorney Winfred III and others
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lafavers et al
as 7:2018cv00112
Defendant:
R Gonzales, M Moberley and J W Lafavers
Plaintiff:
R James Johnson and Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Angelina County District Attorney's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00136
Defendant:
Abel Acosta, The Estate of John Ross Kay, Angelina County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez et al v. Angelina County District Attorney's Office et al
as 9:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Miguel Mendez, Jacob Woodard, Margaret Black and others
Defendant:
Abel Acosta, Judge Paul White, The Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2018cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. FTS International Services LLC
as 4:2018cv00423
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Johnson
Defendant:
FTS International Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
