Cases 11 - 20 of 199
Derry Evans v. Richard Ive
as 17-55657
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRY EVANS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD B. IVES, Warden
Harun Ghaffar v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 17-55590
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARUN A. GHAFFAR, FKA Aaron C. Kelly
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and RICHARD B. IVES, Warden
Otis Harris, III v. USA, et al
as 17-55451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS HARRIS III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD GROSS, Clinical Director, FCI-Lompoc-Low, individual/official capacity, DEAN WONG, Correctional Officer, individual/official capacity and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GAROD GARRISON, Case Manager Coordinator (CMC), individual/official capacity and UMMA SUKHAVAIS, Medical Doctor, Federal Correctional Complex-Beaumont, TX, individual/official capacity
Anthony Moneyham v. A. Warren et al
as 5:2017cv00496
Defendant:
D. Elliot, Richard B. Ives, Dwight Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moneyham
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02347
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lancaster v. Ives et al
as 3:2016cv03129
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
Richard B. Ives, Acting Warden Unknown Associate, Warden Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01927
Warden:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01921
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Raul Rivera Chavez v. Junell et al
as 2:2016cv07299
Petitioner:
Raul Rivera Chavez
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives and United States Judge Junell
Lacey Scott v. Richard B Ives et al
as 5:2016cv00383
Defendant:
Richard B Ives and Six unknown agents
Plaintiff:
Lacey Scott
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
