Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Farmer v. Pierson
as 6:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Carmel Jesse Farmer
Defendant:
RN, FNP Sarah A Pierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Howard, Jr et al
as 4:2021cv04220
Plaintiff:
Tommy Willis
Defendant:
Lt Anthony Howard, Jr, Lt Neil Hinson, Sgt Gabriel Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crane et al v. Margo and Jones, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
Robert H Crane
Defendant:
Margo and Jones, Inc., Autowash Corp., RNS-Crane, LLP and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Sasha Crane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garey v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00547
Defendant:
Clint Sonnier, Candice Jackson, Leonard Jones, . and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. Handcock et al
as 4:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Domanick J Murphy
Defendant:
Carla Bayliff, RN Ryan Handcock, FNP A. Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv04078
Defendant:
Lieutenent Brenda R. Phillips, Skylar A. Dolphin, Sgt. Vandell Dawson and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Earl Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Clayton et al
as 4:2020cv02778
Defendant:
Dr Edgar Hulipas, NP T Tran, Dr B Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Elliot B West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy, Sr. v. Wright et al
as 6:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Lt. Michael L Odom, MHC Lyndsey Howell, Sgt. FNU McAndrews and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penigar v. Glassel et al
as 4:2019cv04191
Defendant:
Lt. Stone, Cpt. Mohammed Touhami, RN Boyce and others
Plaintiff:
Pieron D. Penigar and Kieron Derek Penigar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Prescott v. UTMB Galveston Texas et al
as 3:2019cv00190
Defendant:
UTMB Galveston Texas, D.D.S. Andres Gilman, RN Linda Garner and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
