Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Ortiz v. Baker et al
as 3:2010cv00290
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Robert Chambliss, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. MCDANIEL et al
as 2:2010cv00682
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Debra Brooks, Robert Chambliss and others
Plaintiff:
L. Seville Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steve Cox v. Terrel Bishop, et al
as 10-15391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE MICHAEL COX
Defendant - Appellee:
TERREL BISHOP, BOJA LEMICH and ROBERT CHAMBLISS
Jensen v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2009cv00368
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jensen
Defendant:
E.K. McDaniel, Robert Chambliss and Adam Endel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Davitt v. Tim Vidrine, et al
as 09-15963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. DAVITT
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM VIDRINE, DEBRA BROOKS, ROBERT HENDRIX and others
Raymond Padilla v. State of Nevada Department of, et al
as 09-15818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JIM GIBBONS, HOWARD SKOLNICK and others
Rivero v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Damien Rivero
Defendant:
E. K. McDaniel, A. Endel, Robert Chambliss and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Endel et al
as 3:2008cv00459
Plaintiff:
Tadaryl Williams
Defendant:
Adam Endel, Robert Chambliss, James Greg Cox and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOT USED
as 2:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Defendant:
State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections, Jim Gibbons, Kenny Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Padilla v. State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00419
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Defendant:
State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections, Jim Gibbons, Kenny Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
