Cases 11 - 20 of 187
Irving v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Melvin Irving
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Robert Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shannon v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07025
Plaintiff:
Rasaan Shannon
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07052
Plaintiff:
Brian Gaines
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Robert Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Claybron v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07047
Plaintiff:
Eson Claybron
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haywood v City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07036
Plaintiff:
Antonio Haywood
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Douglas Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07026
Plaintiff:
Elgen Moore
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07028
Plaintiff:
Donald Johnson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Douglas Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07001
Plaintiff:
Joshua King
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willis v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06996
Plaintiff:
Dexter Willis
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04338
Plaintiff:
Robert Gonzalez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
