Cases 11 - 20 of 67
RAINEY v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2017mc00006
Petitioner:
KYLE RAINEY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
Rainey v. Spaulding et al
as 4:2016cv02288
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Rainey
Respondent:
Spaulding and Jane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rainey v. Oddo et al
as 4:2015cv01817
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Rainey
Respondent:
Oddo, USP Allenwood and Jane and/or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rainey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01093
Plaintiff:
Carrie D. Rainey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RAINEY v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN G. RAINEY
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rainey v. Supt. SCI Coal Township et al
as 1:2015cv00839
Petitioner:
George Rainey
Respondent:
Supt. SCI Coal Township, District Attorney of York County PA and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MASON v. O'MARA et al
as 2:2014cv05641
Petitioner:
FLORENCE ELIZABETH MASON
Respondent:
JOHN O'MARA, CORY M. BARITZ, MICHAEL COARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAGE et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05832
Plaintiff:
BELINDA SAGE , OSCAR TORRES , DORIS LAWSON and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rainey v. Superintendent S.C.I. Coal Township et al
as 4:2013cv01806
Petitioner:
Eugene Howard Rainey
Respondent:
Superintendent S.C.I. Coal Township and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAINEY v. PALMER et al
as 2:2012cv07024
Plaintiff:
KYLE RAINEY
Defendant:
ANNE PALMER and PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
