Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Coston et al v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2019cv01389
Defendant:
New York State Attorney General, Supreme Court of N.Y.S., Onondaga County Justice Center and others
Plaintiff:
Rashod Coston and Derrick Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coston et al v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 1:2019cv10221
Defendant:
New York State Attorney General, Supreme Court of N.Y.S., Onondaga County Justice Center and others
Plaintiff:
Rashod Coston and Derrick Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Coston
as 17-423
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Rashod Coston
Coston v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2016cv07087
Petitioner:
Rashod Coston
MDC-Brooklyn:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coston v. Mordue
as 5:2016cv00226
Petitioner:
Rashod Coston
Respondent:
Norman A. Mordue
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3664 e Civil Enforcement of Crim. Restitution Obligation
Coston v. United States Probation Office (SDNY) et al
as 1:2016cv01353
Plaintiff:
Rashod Coston
Defendant:
United States Probation Office (SDNY), Michael Fitzpatrick and Daveena Tumasar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coston v. United States of America
as 5:2014cv01331
Petitioner:
Rashod Coston
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Coston v. U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2013cv07429
Petitioner:
Rashod Coston
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Coston
as 12-4622
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Rashod Coston
Coston v. USA
as 5:2012cv01716
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rashod Coston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
