Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Sabroso v. D. Ray James Correction Facility et al
as 5:2016cv00013
Petitioner:
Carlos Garcia Sabroso
Respondent:
D. Ray James Correction Facility, Tracy Johns, Perry Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nunez v. D. Ray James Correction Facility et al
as 5:2016cv00012
Petitioner:
Ricardo Padilla Nunez
Respondent:
D. Ray James Correction Facility, Tracy Johns, Geo Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dan v. D. Ray James Correctional Institution
as 5:2015cv00093
Petitioner:
Daniel Dan
Respondent:
D. Ray James Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Dan v. D. Ray James Correctional Institution
as 1:2015cv03992
Petitioner:
Daniel Dan
Respondent:
D. Ray James Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lamour v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2015cv00084
Petitioner:
Rodelyn Lamour
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, D. Ray James Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. D. Ray James Correctional Facility
as 5:2014cv00026
Petitioner:
Jerome Williams
Respondent:
D. Ray James Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ilunga v. Syed et al
as 5:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Etsho Ilunga
Defendant:
Salem Syed and D. Ray James Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 5:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel A. N. Thomas
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and D. Ray James Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Quelis v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 5:2013cv00106
Petitioner:
Juan Quelis
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and D. Ray James Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hemmings v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 5:2013cv00107
Petitioner:
Odini Hemmings
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and D. Ray James Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
