Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Rea v. Site Operations Services Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01663
Plaintiff:
Charlie Rea
Defendant:
Site Operations Services Inc and James Hildenbrand
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rea-Ponce v. USA
as 3:2018cv01155
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Hector Arturo Rea-Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rea v. Davis
as 6:2017cv00241
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ramiro Rea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. McCarthy Holthus-Texas, LLP et al
as 5:2016cv00673
Defendant:
Catherine Allen-Rea, James W. Dickerson, First American Title Company and others
214) 291-3801 (fax:
Cole D. Patton
Plaintiff:
Marvin W. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Herndon v. Discount Tires et al
as 3:2016cv01615
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rea'Shaw Herndon
Defendant:
Discount Tires, Houston Police Department, Harris County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon v. Roanoke Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv01616
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rea'Shaw Herndon
Defendant:
Roanoke Police Department, Dallas Police Department and Dallas County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sides v. Fisher et al
as 6:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Sides
Defendant:
Stacy Fisher, Beryl Bailey, Kevin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowlett v. Stephens
as 5:2015cv00978
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Rickey Rea Rowlett
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Rea
as 3:2015cv02886
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marie Rea
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Rea v. Taylor-Brooke Construction, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv01698
Defendant:
Taylor-Brooke Construction, LLC, Larry Payne and Lorie Strawn-Payne
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rea
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
