Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Ramirez v. Marques
as 1:2019cv00152
Respondent:
Rick Marques
Petitioner:
Jesus Rene Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez v. 180 Concrete Design, Inc.
as 5:2019cv00555
Defendant:
180 Concrete Design, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rene Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ramirez v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2018cv00308
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Jesus Rene Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Ramirez v. United States Of America
as 3:2018cv00147
Petitioner:
Jesus Rene Ramirez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. United States Of America
as 3:2017cv00189
Petitioner:
Jesus Rene Ramirez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. United States Of America
as 3:2017cv00190
Petitioner:
Jesus Rene Ramirez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. USA
as 2:2016cv00076
Petitioner:
Anthony Rene Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. United States Of America
as 3:2016cv00087
Petitioner:
Jesus Rene Ramirez
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edwards v. 4JLJ, LLC
as 2:2015cv00299
Plaintiff:
Joshua Edwards, Francisco Gutierrez, Humberto J Morales and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Tarango Jr.
Defendant:
4JLJ, LLC doing business as J4 Oilfield Services and John Jalufka
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Adams et al v. Walgreen Co
as 4:2014cv02761
Plaintiff:
Henry Adams , Worvell Ray Aldridge , Harry Aubrey, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
