Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Benson v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2016cv02093
Petitioner:
Ricky Benson
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benson v. Unknown Agents of Aramark Food Services for the S.C.C.J.C. et al
as 2:2015cv02518
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Unknown Agents of Aramark Food Services for the S.C.C.J.C., Echols, Townsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Holt et al
as 2:2015cv02294
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
T. Holt and P. Paris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Benson v. James Todd, et al
as 14-6329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES D. TODD, United States District Judge, SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT and DIRECTOR OF U.S. POST OFFICE, of Zip code 38134
Benson v. Todd et al
as 2:2014cv02583
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
James D. Todd, Shelby County Government and Director of U.S. Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Benson v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 14-5908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and others
Ricky Benson v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 14-5897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and others
Ricky Benson v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 14-5876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and others
Ricky Benson v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 14-5875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., Mayor, JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR., Director, TONYA BEASLEY, Grievance Supervisor and others
Ricky Benson v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 14-5878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
