Cases 11 - 19 of 19
SAULTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL. JOSH SHAPIRO ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2019cv05778
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, OFFICER DAWN HEUSER, BADGE #439, SPECIAL AGENT ERIC J. BARLOW and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW SAULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. MARLER et al
as 2:2019cv02355
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and SEAN MARLER
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REED v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv02477
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Reed
Respondent:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., Loretta Lynch and David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reed v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2015cv02121
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Reed
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert and A. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUSSIE et al v. NEW JERSEY STATE PUBLIC LAW AND SAFETY et al
as 2:2014cv00971
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PUBLIC LAW AND SAFETY, CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Tennis et al
as 1:2009cv01190
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrews
Defendant:
Franklin Tennis, Jeffrey Rackovan, Erica Foose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS v. TENNIS
as 2:2009cv02127
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREWS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAPLEY v. MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv87257
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREWS and ROBERT ANDREWS
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DANA CORPORATION, STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MAULDIN v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75083
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW MAULDIN
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
