Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Torres v. USA
as 3:2014cv01293
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Edward Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Romaneck v. Safeway Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02015
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Romaneck
Defendant:
Safeway Inc. , Robert Edwards , Janet E. Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dahl v. Virga, et al.
as 2:2014cv00949
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Dahl, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Virga, Mathew Cate, L. M. Pennisi, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. Virga et al
as 2:2013cv02313
Petitioner:
Robert Edward Dahl, Jr
Respondent:
Timothy Virga, Mathew Cate, L.M. Pennisi, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Corey R Shanus v. Robert Edward Auctions LLC et al
as 8:2013cv01239
Movant:
Steven F Grad
Defendant:
Robert Lifson and Robert Edward Auctions LLC
Plaintiff:
Corey R Shanus
United Auburn Indian Community of Auburn Rancheria v. Salazar et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria , Citizens for a Better Way , Stand Up for California! and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Lee Salazar , Kevin K. Washburn , Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Robert Edwards et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv09367
Plaintiff:
Roseann Bertucci, Alan Blomquist, Mark Corcoran and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Does, Johnson and Johnson Services Inc and others
Stephen Yagman v. Dale Kristopher Galipo et al
as 2:2012cv07908
Defendant:
Leroy David Baca, David Eichenlaub, Margaret Eichenlaub and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Olmstead et al v. Bristol-Myers Squib Company et al
as 3:2012cv04619
Plaintiff:
Jack Olmstead , Patricia Nason , Kirby Smith and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squib Company , Sanofi-Aventis US LLC , Sanofi US Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
