Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv03118
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Rocky Moore, NFN Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Moore et al
as 4:2020cv02724
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr.
Respondent:
Sharanda D. Mathis, Rocky Moore, Ashley Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boren v. Baldridge et al
as 4:2020cv02568
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ryan Boren
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Springfield, Justin L. Baldridge, Dir. Lorie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Moore et al
as 4:2020cv02485
Defendant:
Kate E. Christopher, Lannette Linthicum, Rocky Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Charles Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Moore et al
as 4:2020cv01075
Defendant:
Zavien Gartica, Rocky Moore, Amankwu and others
Plaintiff:
Demetric Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiner v. Moore et al
as 4:2020cv00394
Defendant:
Sgt Howard, Regional Directors of Wynne Unit and Sr. Warden Rocky Moore
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2019cv03775
Defendant:
Unit Classification Committee Members, Counsel substitute Tubbs, J. Looney and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Collier et al
as 4:2019cv03263
Defendant:
Lieutenant Marlen Marquez, Captain Carolyn A Pansy, Correction Officer V Aaron E Ripkowski and others
Plaintiff:
William Kelly Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker v. Davis
as 4:2019cv00283
Respondent:
Warden Rocky Moore and Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Clarence Lee Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Davis
as 1:2018cv00959
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Sr. Warden Rocky Moore
Petitioner:
Saul Isaac Flores
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
