Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Ogden v. Ontario Oregon City Police Dept et al
as 2:2020cv02262
Defendant:
Ontario Oregon City Police Dept, Dallas Brockett, Road Runner Towing and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn C. Ogden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crabtree v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv01291
Defendant:
Michael Gower, State of Oregon, Edgar Mickels and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Mercedes Crabtree and Mercedes Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2020cv00126
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Moimoi, Ernesto Romero, Jonathan Armand Harris and others
Defendant:
Multnomah County Circuit Court, State of Oregon, Multnomah County Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182
Romero v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv01327
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tami Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Romero v. Keystone Aviation, LLC, et. al
as 6:2017cv01052
Defendant:
James Aukes, Keystone Aviation, LLC, Shawn Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Romero v. Cain
as 2:2017cv00660
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Petitioner:
Martin Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Romero v. Cofey et al
as 6:2015cv01905
Defendant:
Carrie Cofey, Dr. Paulson Reed and Steve Shelton, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Danny Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Myrick et al
as 2:2015cv01138
Defendant:
ODOC TRCI John Myrick and ODOC TRCI R. Winnett
Plaintiff:
Robert James Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
