Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Hoops v. Robert Roth, MD
as 2:2015cv01421
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hoops
Defendant:
Robert Roth, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Marmot Properties, LLC v. Roth Capital Partners, LLC
as 3:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marmot Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Roth Capital Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burkeybile v. Washoe County et al
as 3:2012cv00558
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ray Burkeybile
Defendant:
Michael V. Roth, Washoe, County Of and Zachary Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roth v. Tiffiny Decorating Co.
as 2:2011cv01239
Plaintiff:
Harvey D. Roth
Defendant:
Tiffiny Decorating Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Roth et al v. Integrity 1st Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00410
Defendant:
Integrity 1st Financial, LLC, LSI Title Agency, Inc., North American Title Company and others
Plaintiff:
Corin L Roth and Eric J Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Burkeybile v. Young et al
as 3:2010cv00187
:
Defendant:
Steven P. Elliott, Micahel V Roth and Zach Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menagerie Investments and Holdings, LLC v. InstaSave, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01323
Defendant:
InstaSave, Inc. and Roth Kline
Plaintiff:
Menagerie Investments and Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Patino v. Roth et al
as 3:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
Tullio Patino
Defendant:
Michael V. Roth and Washoe County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wimberly et al
as 2:2007cv01102
Plaintiff:
Stanton Wimberly, Eric Roth, Handy Man and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
