Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Rutherford et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29916
Plaintiff:
Lois Rutherford and Kenneth Rutherford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24701
Plaintiff:
Caroline Stevens , Sandra Foley , Linda Barnhill and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rutherford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20735
Plaintiff:
Norma Rutherford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutherford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18209
Plaintiff:
Marcella Rutherford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Neomedic International, S.L. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutherford v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06986
Plaintiff:
Tammy Rutherford
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutherford v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06145
Plaintiff:
Carolyn S. Rutherford
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutherford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05883
Plaintiff:
Alice Rutherford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutherford et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv31112
Plaintiff:
Nelya Rutherford and Mike Rutherford
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutherford v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv30353
Plaintiff:
Genevieve R. Rutherford
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutherford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv29906
Plaintiff:
Lola Rutherford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
