Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv80044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eliyahu v. Homepoint Financial Corporation s/b/m to Stonegate Mortgage Corporation
as 9:2017cv81247
Plaintiff:
Ilan Eliyahu
Defendant:
Homepoint Financial Corporation s/b/m to Stonegate Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dyal v. Jones et al
as 5:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Dyal
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones, S. B. Rossitier, Jeffery Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyal v. Jones et al
as 5:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Dyal
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones, N. Jeffcoat, S. B. Rossitier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Jones et al
as 3:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallace
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Diane Andrews, S. B. Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent. Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Ronald Searcy
Defendant:
Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent. Inc., R. Yax, S. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv00397
Plaintiff:
Willie D. Solomon
Defendant:
Julie Jones, M. Millette, Diana Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Searcy v. Ceo,Past and Present Presidents Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent Ing. et al
as 3:2015cv01104
Plaintiff:
Ronald Searcy
Defendant:
Ceo,Past and Present Presidents Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent Ing., R. Yax, S. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Medical Staff et al
as 3:2015cv00543
Plaintiff:
Malcolm J Marshall, Sr
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Diane Andrews, S. B. Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
