Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Hammond v. Wooleyhan et al
as 3:2010cv03329
Plaintiff:
Jesse . Hammond
Defendant:
John Wooleyhan, Anita Rodriquez, David Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Kaeb et al
as 1:2009cv05501
Defendant:
Douglas Kaeb, Douglas Kaeb, Douglas Kaeb and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
v. S & H Hauling, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv04636
Defendant:
S & H Hauling, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Pension Fund and Welfare Funds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
The Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois et al v. S & H Floor Covering Inc
as 3:2008cv50249
Plaintiff:
The Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois, The Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois, The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and others
Defendant:
S & H Floor Covering Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Townsend et al v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv04876
Plaintiff:
Fred Townsend and Fred Townsend
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, R. N. Skog and S. H. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gatlin v. Criscione et al
as 1:2007cv07212
Plaintiff:
George Gatlin and George Gatlin
Defendant:
A. Criscione, S. Mulkerrin, Anthony Caputo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. S & H Trucking, Inc.
as 1:2007cv05630
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
S & H Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.