Cases 11 - 20 of 34
e.Digital Corporation v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02891
Plaintiff:
e.Digital Corporation
Defendant:
Osram Sylvania, Inc., Buy.Com, Inc., Hastings Internet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Galvan v. Sears Holdings Management Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
Lizette Galvan
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Galvan v. Sears Holdings Management Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00444
Plaintiff:
Lizette Galvan
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padilla et al v. Black Company et al
as 5:2012cv00653
Plaintiff:
Edgar Jesus Santillan Padilla and Karla Santillan
Defendant:
Black Company, Sears, Roebuck & Co. , One World Technologies, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Casida v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv01052
Plaintiff:
Candace Casida
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears, Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nikola Lovig v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 5:2011cv00756
Defendant:
Does and Sears Roebuck & Co
Plaintiff:
Nikola Lovig
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv07681
Defendant:
Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation, DOES, Global Gold, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Global Gold, Inc. and MOES
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Styles for Less, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06721
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hybrid Promotions, LLC v. Liberty Apparel Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03144
Plaintiff:
Hybrid Promotions, LLC
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation, Liberty Apparel Company, Inc., Sears Holdings Management Corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
