Cases 11 - 20 of 1,065
VanDorn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Plaintiff:
Jonathan VanDorn, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Manns et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alfred A. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer T Manns, Officer Halib Kahn, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryhter et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02829
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Plaintiff:
Shelli Ryhter and Jerry Ryhter, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lightner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02772
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Lightner, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02693
Plaintiff:
Robert Romo, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vasiloff v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02712
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sr. George Vasiloff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02711
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Desi Dwayne Turner, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballantyne Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
James Ballantyne Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vera, Sr. v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02672
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Plaintiff:
Jorge Vera, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
